Uretero-Ileal Anastomotic Strictures Following Bricker Urinary Diversion: A Retrospective Study

Y. Rharmili *

Department of Urology, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Tangier, Morocco.

Y. Retal

Department of Urology, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Tangier, Morocco.

Z. Bakali Issaoui

Department of Urology, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Tangier, Morocco.

A. Khallouk

Department of Urology, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Tangier, Morocco.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Aims: This study evaluated the incidence, clinical presentation, management strategies, and risk factors associated with uretero-ileal anastomotic strictures (UIAS) after radical cystectomy with Bricker ileal conduit urinary diversion and compared the findings with published data.

Study Design: Retrospective single-centre observational study.

Place and Duration of Study: Department of Urology, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Tangier, Morocco, January 2021 to January 2026.

Methodology: Medical records of patients who underwent radical cystectomy with Bricker ileal conduit diversion were reviewed retrospectively. Patients operated on at the study institution were included; those with incomplete records, insufficient postoperative follow-up, loss to follow-up, or surgery performed elsewhere were excluded. Demographic, clinical, perioperative, and postoperative variables were analysed.

Results: Among 88 patients, 10 developed UIAS, corresponding to an incidence of approximately 12%. The mean age of affected patients was 62 years, and 80% were male. No statistically significant association was identified between stricture occurrence and age, sex, or smoking status. Strictures were detected incidentally on surveillance imaging in 50% of cases, while deterioration of renal function, acute pyelonephritis, and flank pain accounted for 30%, 10%, and 10% of presentations, respectively. The mean time to diagnosis was approximately 12 months, with most strictures diagnosed between 6 and 12 months after surgery. Left-sided strictures were most frequent (50%), followed by right-sided and bilateral strictures (25% each). Mono-J drainage was successful in 40% of patients.

Conclusion: UIAS remains a clinically relevant complication after Bricker urinary diversion. Early detection, decompression when required, and structured long-term surveillance are important for preserving renal function.

Keywords: Radical cystectomy, Bricker ileal conduit, uretero-ileal anastomotic stricture, urinary diversion, hydronephrosis, renal function, postoperative surveillance, percutaneous nephrostomy, mono-J stent, bladder cancer


How to Cite

Rharmili, Y., Y. Retal, Z. Bakali Issaoui, and A. Khallouk. 2026. “Uretero-Ileal Anastomotic Strictures Following Bricker Urinary Diversion: A Retrospective Study”. Asian Journal of Research and Reports in Urology 9 (1):205-16. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrru/2026/v9i1165.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.